While reading the Constitution of India and the legal debates and case laws, I realised that so many legal battles have been fought around freedom of expression and liberty. In fact, the entire freedom struggle was around freedom and liberty. We should have the right to manage our own affairs, to have our own representatives in Parliament, and to freedom of expression and the right to live a dignified life . This has been the struggle of all the countries that have fought their battle for freedom. I'm surprised to see how easily people give in to social pressure . The freedom of expression, the right to a dignified life, and the right to make choices : these are all surrendered to social pressure quite often. How many of us would speak what we feel on any issue if we are surrounded by people who have a different opinion on the same issue? All of us have experienced a simple instance where, at a wedding, the music is generally loud and relatives who have come from distant places...
Are we the roles playing in this world, or are we the souls who are capable of playing different roles? This is a fundamental question because all subsequent questions, such as those about morality, responsibility, guilt, right, wrong, and the like, flow from it. Generally, while living our lives, we take guidance from our roles. If we are in a family, we want to protect our family. Similarly, we define different roles and rights and wrongs associated with them. I was reading Jurisprudence yesterday for my law examination, and I came across a beautiful concept called the " Grudge Informer Dilemma ," proposed by the German legal philosopher Gustav Radbruch . A lady passed on the information to the Nazi government, and the husband was executed by the Nazi's. Post the change of the Hitler regime, a prosecution was launched against her, and she argued that she complied with the law of the land, and that's why she should not be held guilty. Radbruch argued that when positi...