Skip to main content

Posts

Reality Check in the 40's

 Krishna would have met so many people in his lifetime on this Earth; in fact, almost all the kings of that time and many great sages. But why did he decide to be the charioteer of Arjuna? Because all the others were busy with their own belief systems and pursuits, and it was only Arjuna who dared to stay confused before Krishna. Bhishma is very sure that he has to honour his vow to protect the kingdom of Hastinapur, Duryodhana was very sure that he has to become the king the Hastinapur at any cost, Karna was sure that he has to prove himself to be a greater warrior than Arjuna, Bhima was sure that he has to take revenge, Yudhistira was sure that he has to follow the path of Dharma, as he understood Dharma to be, Dhritrastra was blind in his attachment to son, Gandhari decided to blindly stay by the side of her husband and sons. Krishna could not find any person other than Arjuna who was ready to listen to the truth and set truth as the sole guiding force of his life. When we sit i...
Recent posts

चुनिंदा संवेदनशीलता

 कृष्ण किसी भी चीज से आसक्त न होकर भी इतने दृढ़ निश्चयी कैसे हैं? द्रौपदी के चिरहरण, लक्षगृह की घटना या अभिमन्यु की मृत्यु से वे विचलित नहीं होते। ऐसा नहीं है कि वे अप्रभावित रहते हैं, बल्कि वे अपनी समता बनाए रखते हैं ताकि उचित समय पर कार्रवाई कर सकें। ऐसा इसलिए है क्योंकि उनका ध्यान हमेशा व्यापक दृष्टि पर केंद्रित रहता है। कृष्ण सर्वज्ञ हैं, वे अतीत और भविष्य दोनों को जानते हैं और इसलिए वे सभी बातों को समझ पाते हैं। वे देख सकते हैं कि कुरुक्षेत्र के बाद धर्म का शासन स्थापित होगा। साधारण मनुष्य, जो इतने जागरूक नहीं हैं, उनका क्या? वे कठिन परिस्थितियों में शांत कैसे रह सकते हैं? वे विचलित क्यों नहीं होते? द्रौपदी के अपमान से भीम इतना व्याकुल क्यों नहीं हुआ कि उसने दुशासन को मारने और उसके सीने का रक्त पीने की प्रतिज्ञा कर ली? लेकिन क्या भीम इतना ही व्याकुल होगा जब दुर्योधन किसी अन्य स्त्री के साथ ऐसा ही करेगा? जब अर्जुन भीष्म और द्रोण को दूसरी तरफ से लड़ते देख युद्धक्षेत्र से भागने की सोच रहा था, तो क्या वह उसी संघर्ष से गुज़रता अगर उसके बड़े-बुजुर्ग दूसरी तरफ से न लड़ रहे होते? नहीं...

Selective Sensitivity

How is Krishna not attached to anything and yet so decisive? He will not be shaken by the Chirharan of Draupadi or the Lakshagraha episode or by the death of Abhimanyu. Not so that he will not be affected, but he will be able to maintain his equanimity so that he may take action at an appropriate time. It is because his focus is always on the larger. Krishna is omniscient, and he knows the past as well as the future and is therefore able to connect the dots. He can see that post-Kurukshetra, the rule of Dharma will be established. What about the ordinary human beings, who are not that aware? How can they stay calm in tough situations? How can they not get fixated? How can Bhima not get so agitated with the insult to Draupadi as to take a vow to kill Dushasana and drink the blood from his chest? But will Bhima be so agitated when Duryodhana does the same thing with any other woman? When Arjuna is thinking of running away from the battlefield after looking at Bhishma and Drona fighting f...

Are You Sure?

Everybody wants to be sure. It looks very nice to win the debates and to prove our points. It looks very attractive to be sure of what we do in life. To be confident of our viewpoints. Firm belief helps us move fast. While driving on the road, it helps if we are sure of the destination. We set the map in Google Maps and keep following the directions. There is no confusion. What if we are confused about the destination? We will reach nowhere. That's why the whole of the world tries to give certainty to the traveller. I recall the following few lines from Madhushala, written by Shri Harivansh Rai Bachchan: मदिरालय जाने को घर से चलता है पीनेवाला,  'किस पथ से जाऊँ?' असमंजस में है वह भोलाभाला अलग अलग पथ बतलाते सब पर मैं यह बतलाता हूँ -  'राह पकड़ तू एक चला चल, पा जाएगा मधुशाला। This is another way of seeking certainty that whatever path you take, you will reach the destination. But what if we are sure about the destination and reach there fast, but after reaching the destina...

अध्यात्म क्या है?

 पृथ्वी, जल, अग्नि, वायु और आकाश ये पाँच तत्व संपूर्ण सृष्टि के मूलभूत घटक हैं। हम इनकी रचना को अनेक रूपों में देखते हैं। कुछ रूप हमें भयभीत करते हैं, जबकि कुछ रूपों से हमें प्रेम हो जाता है। हम समुद्र तट पर शाम का आनंद लेते हैं, धीमी हवा के बीच समुद्र के पानी को निहारते हैं। लेकिन अगर हवा तेज हो जाए और तूफान या सुनामी का रूप ले ले, तो वही पानी और हवा बेहद खतरनाक हो जाते हैं, और हम उस जगह से भागना चाहते हैं। हम इसे आपदा की श्रेणी में रखते हैं। सतह के नीचे थोड़ी सी अधिक ऊर्जा सभी इमारतों को हिला देती है, और हम इसे भूकंप कहते हैं। हल्की बारिश देखने में बहुत सुखद लगती है, लेकिन जब भारी बारिश होती है, तो वह बाढ़ में बदल जाती है। जो देखने में बहुत आकर्षक लगता है, वह इन तत्वों में से किसी एक की थोड़ी सी "शरारत" से आपदा में बदल सकता है। लेकिन साथ ही, अगर हम ब्रह्मांड का अध्ययन करें, तो नए तारे और ग्रह हमेशा उसी "शरारत" का परिणाम होते हैं। जो हमें आपदा प्रतीत होता है, वह वास्तव में नई सृष्टि के लिए प्रकृति का तंत्र है। हमारे भीतर भी वही पाँच तत्व काम करते हैं। हमारे आकाश मे...

What is Spirituality?

The five elements Prithvi, Jal, Agni, Vayu, and Aakash are the fundamental components of the whole of creation. We encounter their creation in so many different forms. Some of the forms frighten us, while we fall in love with some of those forms. We enjoy an evening on the beach, looking at the ocean's water as the wind blows slowly. But if the wind blows fast and takes the form of a hurricane or tsunami, the same water and wind become quite dangerous, and we want to get out of the place. We categorise it as a disaster. A little excess of energy below the surface shakes all the buildings, and we call that an earthquake. Drizzling looks very pleasant, but when it rains heavily, it turns into a flood. What looks very attractive can turn into disaster with a slight "mischief" from one of these elements. But, at the same time, if we examine the cosmos, new stars and planets are always the result of that "mischief". What appears to be a disaster to us is actually nat...

Dharma Yuddha

So many battles were fought in India and other parts of the world. What was so different about the Battle of Kurukshetra? Battle of Kurukshetra was a Dharamyuddha. Why? Because the Pandavas fought the battle under the guidance of Krishna himself to establish Dharma. Unlike other battles, it was not a battle fought for greed or dominance. It was a battle for the larger interest. When the battle started, Arjuna wanted to run away from the battlefield because he did not want to fight his own cousins and teachers. Arjuna felt that it would be better not to fight the battle rather than take the blame for killing his own grandfather Bhishma and teacher Drona. Then Krishna told him about the real form of Dharma. He told the entire Bhagavad Gita to Arjuna. He said that all living beings and also non-living things have taken birth from Krishna and will merge back into Krishna. That's why truth and only truth shall be the guiding force behind the decision to fight or not to fight the battle....

The Four Yugas

According to Hindu mythology, there are 4 Yugas: Satyuga, Tretayuga, Dwaparyuga, and Kaliyuga. We are currently living in the Kaliyuga. Mahabharata took place in Dwaparyuga, and the Ramayana in Tretayuga. There are many stories of Satya Yuga, not with a specific hero, but with so many heroes.  In Satya Yuga, the centre of our life was the truth. Actions were guided by purity, and therefore, when we listen to the stories of Satya Yuga, even the slightest impurity of thoughts is not tolerated. People would perform tough penance whenever their purity was disturbed. Even if greed enters a corner of their heart in disguise, they will feel very bad about it. Since truth prevailed everywhere, the relationships were very fulfilling, and people lived their lives based on their passion. People lived meaningful lives since there were no manipulations and pretensions, and therefore their energy was not wasted on frivolous things. Then came Treta Yuga. Treta means the third, and it also represe...

Achievement

There may be two different approaches to life. First, we know, and we try to achieve the best based on the information available to us. Second, we acknowledge that we know very little and try to explore the unknown. While following the first approach, we may set different targets in this world. Someone may feel that more money brings more happiness because they can buy a good home, luxurious cars, branded clothes, and travel in luxury to different parts of the world. Somebody may target powerful positions and feel that once they reach these positions, they will get respect from society and VVIP treatment from everybody around. Somebody may set a target around knowledge because he feels that, with knowledge, he will be able to get both money and power. Somebody may keep the target around some spiritual experience because he may feel that spiritual experience is above all these worldly experiences. Whatever the target, we feel that we will be happy after achieving that target. We have t...

Inner Weakness

How will we rate a home that is very dirty inside, while the gate and outer walls are spic and span? We would be quite impressed at first, but as we enter the house, we will immediately realise the reality. A fruit looks very tempting at first, but as we cut it, we find that it is rotten. We meet many people in our lives who look impressive at first sight, but as we interact with them, we get to notice the fears and insecurities inside them. Some of them may have a very strong external support system in the form of powerful positions, networking, and wealth, but from inside, they are very hollow and weak. I wonder why we concentrate so much on our outer appearance while ignoring the inner strength? Is it laziness? That's difficult to believe because many people work quite hard to improve their outer appearance. Then what? I think that the answer lies in the Ramayana. Lord Hanuma had all the strength and energy to do miracles. However, in his childhood, he did not meet Rama, and the...

Do We Dare to Examine our Fears?

There is a very strange characteristic of fear. When we are afraid, we try to take shelter in something that makes us secure. Some mental story, belief system, community, position, or money. Over time, we become quite fearful of losing that shelter. We are afraid of dying, because death is a reality of life. We take shelter behind the concept of "X" or "Y" or "Z" God. We start believing that nothing will go wrong to us and that God will take care of us. Then somebody points out that the God we believe in is just an image that many fearful people have created together and planted in our minds. We get frightened by this. How can somebody dare to shatter the image of God that gives us so much security? We start disliking that person who shows us the mirror. In life, so many ups and downs come. We pass through crises, and as and when a crisis comes, doubt enters our minds about our own defence system. Then the cunning mind thinks whether the psychological defe...

Sensitivity is Dangerous?

When we look at children on the street with no resources, all of us feel like doing something for them. When we go to a hospital oncology ward and see the patients fighting cancer, we feel as if we could do something for them. When we see the rotten systems all around us, we feel as if we could do something to set them right. When we see the rivers so dirty, all of us feel equally desperate to clean them. Then? We get busy with our family. We take our attention away from those children, patients, rotten systems, and the rivers, and just focus on our children. Somehow our conscious mind rationalises that too much sensitivity is dangerous. We shift the focus to two children, or a few more.  Buddha's father tries to keep him away from reality. He would not allow young Siddhartha to meet the old people, go to the crematorium, or meet poor people. He would try to fill his life with all kinds of wealth and pleasures. Yet, young Siddhartha was so sensitive that a few incidents of contact...

Intelligence

I don't think that there is even the slightest doubt that we feel happy when we are free to explore. When we love and are loved. Exploration expands us, and love makes us merge. Love and exploration also go hand in hand. We can't explore something or somebody unless we love that thing or person. Einstein can't explore Quantum Physics so deeply and with so much dedication unless he is deeply in love with the subject.  But biology plays its own role. We feel vulnerable. We want the company of somebody who can take care of us when we fall ill and when things do not turn our way. We form many different relationships in search of security. Give and take is the basis of most of these relationships. We become ambitious and feel that "X" amount of money and power will make us secure forever, which never happens. Probably, intelligence demands that we take stock of the actual needs for survival so that the time and energy spent on these things may be minimised, and we get ...

कबीर ऐसा यहु संसार है, जैसा सैंबल फूल

It appears to me that the root cause of inauthenticity is the caging of truth. Trust is like light. It can not be confined to a cage. That's why whenever there is an effort to cage the truth, we end up living with inauthenticities. We define certain behaviour as unacceptable in society, and there is a lot of taboo around it; therefore, people hide it. We set similar boundaries in relationships, especially in marriage, and therefore people often surreptitiously cross these boundaries. We set boundaries around our children: they will not use mobile phones or laptops, and will not have girlfriends or boyfriends. Then they do it without telling us, and we feel there is a lack of integrity. If society makes admitting the truth so difficult, people will definitely try to find workable solutions. People will be inauthentic. They will say something they actually don't do or don't believe. That is the reason why we have crises in parenting and relationships all around us. People wi...

कबीर ऐसा यहु संसार है, जैसा सैंबल फूल

मुझे लगता है कि बनावटीपन की जड़ सच्चाई को पिंजरे में बंद करना है। विश्वास प्रकाश के समान है। इसे पिंजरे में कैद नहीं किया जा सकता। इसीलिए जब भी सच्चाई को पिंजरे में बंद करने का प्रयास किया जाता है, हम अंततः बनावटीपन के साथ जीने लगते हैं। हम समाज में कुछ व्यवहारों को अस्वीकार्य मानते हैं और उनसे जुड़े कई सामाजिक निषेध हैं; इसलिए लोग उन्हें छिपाते हैं। हम रिश्तों में, विशेषकर विवाह में, इसी तरह की सीमाएँ निर्धारित करते हैं और इसलिए लोग अक्सर चुपके से इन सीमाओं को पार कर जाते हैं। हम अपने बच्चों के लिए सीमाएँ निर्धारित करते हैं: वे मोबाइल फोन या लैपटॉप का उपयोग नहीं करेंगे, और उनके कोई प्रेमी या प्रेमिका नहीं होगी। फिर वे हमें बिना बताए ऐसा करते हैं, और हमें लगता है कि उनमें ईमानदारी की कमी है। यदि समाज सच्चाई को स्वीकार करना इतना कठिन बना देता है, तो लोग निश्चित रूप से व्यावहारिक समाधान खोजने का प्रयास करेंगे। लोग बनावटी हो जाएँगे। वे ऐसी बातें कहेंगे जो वे वास्तव में नहीं करते या जिन पर वे विश्वास नहीं करते। यही कारण है कि हमारे चारों ओर पालन-पोषण और रिश्तों में संकट दिखाई देते हैं। लोग...