Skip to main content

Pursuit of Happiness

It's strange to see how different human beings make so many different meanings of life, and how everybody is so convinced of their own. As children, we try to fathom the depth of reality and find ourselves grossly incapable. We find none around us who can answer the most fundamental questions: "Where have we come from?", "What is the meaning of death?", "What happens after death?", "What is happiness?", "Why is there so much inequality in this world?", "Why are there so many fights among nations?", "Why am I born in this family?" The young minds have so many questions. I believe that each one of us would have had all these questions. But where did they disappear? Why are we so convinced about our own understanding of the meaning of life?

Probably, that's a defence mechanism of the human mind. Each one of us has two options. First, to keep seeking the meaning of reality, which is a difficult and unsure option. Somebody may set it as the mission of his life, like Buddha, and may or may not be able to understand that. Second, society offers an attractive alternative. Each society has its own story about the meaning of life. You may believe in that and may live accordingly. If you stay in the same society all throughout your life, chances are good that you will be so busy all through your life in the "pursuit of happiness".  Why? Because society has "intelligently" written all these stories about happiness to ensure that the pursuit never ends. If somebody makes a meaning around money, there is no outer limit to earning money. You may keep earning money till you get tired. If somebody sets the meaning of life around power, there is no end to that. If somebody seeks the meaning of life around family, there is no end again. You may first be concerned about the children, then grandchildren, and then grand-grandchildren. 

Sometimes I get surprised to see how the most intelligent minds get trapped in this matrix. Probably because this has nothing to do with "intelligence". The way we define intelligence is actually very deceptive. Intelligence is not about computational power. A laptop may have the best RAM, processor, and hard disk. It may have everything best, and yet it may be dumb. Because it does not know what to do. If a terrorist uses the same laptop, it will destroy the world. The same thing applies to AI. AI is not intelligent. It just provides a summary of what is already available on the web. Intelligence is all about awareness of the whole and then living in any frame with that awareness. An intelligent actor is not the one who loses awareness of being an actor while acting and gets so immersed in the role. Rather, an intelligent actor is the one who retains awareness of being an actor and then performs the role to the best of his capacity as per the demands of the script.

Until we are aware of the reality of the matrix, we will never be able to break free of it. But then we have a hard problem to resolve. We get trapped in the matrix while we are young and unaware. We form many relationships, and most of the people we associate with may not have any inclination to get out of the matrix. They consider it to be real and may like to live therein. That's obviously easy. But somehow we want to break free of this matrix. We want to abide by the rules of the matrix to survive and, at the same time, make efforts to come out of the matrix, and that becomes quite challenging. We feel like Abhimanyu, who has somehow got into the Chakravyuh but is somehow unable to come out of it. At the same time, the "well-wishers" advise us to accept this matrix as reality. But there is something within us that has understood the reality of the matrix and can't seek happiness in that limited frame anymore, and I feel that once it is clearly understood by that "intelligence" that the matrix is a very limited frame, there is no going back, and it's just a matter of time before we get free of this matrix. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Field of Awareness

 I presented a paper on Vipassana long back at Delhi University, and at that time, a professor there asked me a question: "Who realises the temporality of the sensations when we practice Vipassana: the mind or something else?" That question stayed with me. I told him about my experience in Estonia. Once, I went on an office tour in Estonia, where it was extremely cold at around -15 degrees. I walked outdoors for quite a long time and developed severe stomach pain. With no medicines available to me and no doctor to visit, I sat in Vipassana and began observing sensations. After about an hour of observation, the pain disappeared. I told him that I don't know whether that was a realisation of the mind or something else, but the same brain that experienced pain some time back had no pain after some time.  The question is who was feeling the pain and where that pain disappeared after observation. When we sit in Vipassana, our minds are full of so many thoughts. Usually, our m...

A "home" decorated with "bonsai"

 Somebody gifted a plant sometime back. When I look at the plant on the Table, it appears to me as if the plant had the potential to grow into a big tree, but we confined the little plant within the limits of the pot, and it has grown strangely. It has a thick stem but has small leaves and branches. We have designed the plants to look the way we like. What "I" want is more important than what the "plant" is. The plant will grow the way "I" like it to grow. And then, "I" would also claim that "I" love the plant.  Yesterday, I went to a coaching institute to get some test series for a competitive exam for my daughter. The guide there spoke for around 40-45 minutes on the risks and chances of getting selected in different competitive examinations. So much competition. Fear is instilled into the minds of the students from the very beginning. Everything is around fear. If they are not able to get enrolment in a professional course , they wi...

Kurukshetra Within Ourselves

I watched the Netflix series Kurukshetra today. It's a wonderfully made series and, in fact, made me recall my childhood series of the Mahabharata that used to be telecast on DD. Mahabharata is magical. The most magical thing about the Mahabharata is that it has no straitjacket definition of Dharma . The entire battle of Kurukshetra is for Dharma, and everybody feels that he is fighting the battle for Dharma.  When Bhishma realises that Vichitravirya needs to be married, he goes to the Swamvara of Amba, Ambika, and Ambalika and forcefully brings them to Hastinapur . Ambika and Ambalika are married to Vichitravirya, while Amba carries out penance to take revenge on Bhishma. Why did Bhishma bring these three girls against their wishes to Hastinapur? If Vichitravirya wanted to marry, he should have shown courage and participated in the Swamvara. After all, Swamvara meant that the girls wanted to marry the most courageous person. Bhishma deprived them of their rights for his attac...