Skip to main content

Compassion of Krishna

Gandhari, after the battle of Kurukshetra, when all her sons have been killed by the Pandavas, is full of anger. Krishna visits her, and she asks Krishna many questions. Krishna, why did you not prevent the battle while you could have? Krishna, why did you allow so many people to be killed? She is not ready to listen to the answers of Krishna because she is so stuck on her mental stories around loss of children, grief, anger and hatred that she curses Krishna that Dwarka will submerge into the ocean and all his family members will die. 

Why did Krishna lack compassion, and why did he not save all the Kauravas and Pandavas? Didn't compassion demand that He should have prevented the battle? In fact, not only the Kauravas, Pandavas lost all their son in the battle. Abhimanyu was killed. Ghatotkacha was killed. Even if the death of the Kauravas was required for the larger good, why did he not use his Sudarshana Chakra and finish the battle in one go so that none from the side of the Pandavas would be killed?

That's the dilemma that every person on the path of inner journey has to face. He would feel like fulfilling many unreasonable demands just to avoid conflicts. He would also feel like stepping into the shoes of incompetent people and doing their work so as to maintain order. Krishna also could have negotiated peace. He could have offered the Pandavas to stay with him in Dwarka. He also could have used his Sudarshana Chakra and finished the battle without any loss on the side of the Pandavas. If that were the case, the divine would have acted alone in this entire universe. There is no need to create so many human beings and other creatures. What Krishna is trying to do is to help the Pandavas understand how to live life with that "complete awareness" rather than what society has told us. "Complete awareness" means when we understand the whole of it, rather than a part thereof and decide from that "limited perspective".

Fighting the battle on behalf of Arjuna is not the purpose of Krishna being there at the battlefield. It is to enable Arjuna to fight his own battle. All of us are products of our own conditioning. Since childhood, we have acquired numerous impressions in our conscious and unconscious minds. The rights and wrongs, good and bad. We acquire these impressions quite often without examination. Because we are not aware of the whole of reality. Because quite often discussions in society are very narrow. Arjuna will have the impression that he should not raise arms against his teachers and elders, but will not be told what to do when that elder or teacher is fighting for something harmful to everybody around. Will a son listen to the parents who want him to take dowry? Will a son listen to the parents who want him to exploit his wife for not bringing dowry? Will a son not resist the command of his parents who ask him to take a bribe? Obviously, he will have to resist. That's what Krishna told Arjuna. 

That's what an aware person does. He does not avoid conflicts. Avoiding conflicts is like brushing the garbage under the carpet. That will make the entire room filthy. It's just a dereliction. We will have to face the conflicts with greater energy at a later date. He will not fight the battle for Arjuna but rather enable him to fight his own battle. Arjuna can fight the battle only when he is fully aware of what's going on inside him, as well as what's going on inside the opponent. That requires complete awareness in the present moment. Each one of us will have to fight our own battle, just like Arjuna. We must make decisions to confront conflicts directly in our lives rather than avoiding them. We need to fight our own battle rather than depend on someone else to fight it. Similarly, we can't fight another person's battle.

Awareness is the key. We just need to be vigilant. Whether our decision to avoid conflict comes from laziness, fear, or the wisdom to strategise? Whether our decision to fight springs from restlessness, compulsive behaviour, provocation, or intelligent choice? Are we helping to enable others or merely becoming a tool to perpetuate their laziness and exploitative mindset? Whether we can be fully aware of our conditioning and consciously let go of it, or whether we get swayed by it? Compassion does not mean mindlessly pleasing somebody; rather, it means making them "aware" of their inner movements and enabling them to fight their own battles.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Field of Awareness

 I presented a paper on Vipassana long back at Delhi University, and at that time, a professor there asked me a question: "Who realises the temporality of the sensations when we practice Vipassana: the mind or something else?" That question stayed with me. I told him about my experience in Estonia. Once, I went on an office tour in Estonia, where it was extremely cold at around -15 degrees. I walked outdoors for quite a long time and developed severe stomach pain. With no medicines available to me and no doctor to visit, I sat in Vipassana and began observing sensations. After about an hour of observation, the pain disappeared. I told him that I don't know whether that was a realisation of the mind or something else, but the same brain that experienced pain some time back had no pain after some time.  The question is who was feeling the pain and where that pain disappeared after observation. When we sit in Vipassana, our minds are full of so many thoughts. Usually, our m...

Do we love anybody?

Are we competent to love? It seems a very strange statement in the first instance. Do we need any competence to love? Love seems so natural. But the strange thing is that most of us do not love even ourselves. Do we? What do we love? Our self-image, our beliefs, body, and ambitions. "I" am good, and the others should appreciate me for being good. "I" believe in a particular thought or religion, and consider myself to be a sum-total of these thoughts and beliefs. "I" and my body, and therefore want to protect the body and become anxious whenever there is a threat to the body or a disease that does not get cured. "I" also become happy when this body feels instinctive pleasure, such as after eating tasty food, doing shopping, travelling to a place "I" like. "I" am my ambitions and work hard to achieve my targets. What is love, on the other hand? Love is a complete merger. When there is no difference between "I" and ...

Choice and Surrender

I was just listening to a talk by Sister Shivani . She says that we don't need to choose. Rather, we need to surrender, and the almighty decides for us. That's almost an impossible thing for the control freaks. How can I not choose? My choices have made me what I am. For example, I decided to do CA and write the civil services examination , and that's what defines what I am today professionally. I decided not to drink liquor, and I am proud of the fact that I am a teetotaler . I chose to read thousands of books on Neurology, Philosophy, Psychology, Quantum Physics and Mysticism . I also decided to explore Astrology and practice Vipassana . I decided to take sessions for the children. I chose my friends and people I would like to spend time with. The sum total of all these things is what I am today. How can I give away choices?  Most achievers are control freaks, and it is quite difficult for them to give up their choices. In fact, they have reached to their present positi...