Skip to main content

Observation and conclusions

Our brains are conditioned from childhood to draw conclusions. We observe a food item and quickly conclude whether it is tasty or not. We encounter a person and quickly conclude whether he is good or not. We undergo some experience and quickly conclude whether that experience was good or bad. Our brain constantly categorizes everything into good or bad, right or wrong, depending on our conditioning. We are in such a hurry because we have defined the purpose of life in terms of certain achievements, and any and everything that supports those achievements is good, and the rest are bad. 

When conclusions become primary, observation becomes secondary. We are always in a hurry to conclude and therefore miss the most crucial part of the observation. Why Ravana is not able to listen to Vibhishana is because his mind has already concluded that he is not going to let go of Sita. His mind wants to possess Sita at any cost. That's why his mind just closes down on any advice to let go of Sita. That's why whenever Vibhishana rises to speak, his mind already concludes that Vibhishana is an adversary and stops listening to him, and therefore reacts aggressively. The same thing happened to Duryodhana. When Krishna comes to meet him as a messenger of the Pandavas to stop the battle, he just does not listen because his mind has already concluded.

Whenever our mind has a strong desire to get something, it will close down. It will not observe and just conclude. We have a strong desire to live comfortably, and somebody tells us to go for a 10-day Vipassana camp, our mind will not listen and conclude that "I am not interested". We will close our ears to whatever the other person tells us about the camp. We have a strong desire to be certain, and the mind will form different beliefs about God and reality. It will not observe anything that contradicts those beliefs. If somebody has a strong fear, they will feel desperate for security. Babas and Astrologers are sitting equally desperate to get hold of these people and offer them some remedy in the form of a ring studded with some stone, and once such a person wears that ring, he concludes that the ring is protecting him, and after that, there is no scope for observation. 

We have a strong desire to get settled and, therefore, conclude that a particular job is better than the other. Once we take that decision, we just close our minds to observation. We have a strong desire to "be happy" and therefore conclude what makes us happy. We keep running after those objects of happiness without ever examining whether the fundamental conclusions about the correlation between these "objects of happiness" and "true happiness" are right. We want to have the peace of mind desperately, and conclude that being insensitive to the ecosystem will make us peaceful, or not thinking much about the ecosystem will make us peaceful. We enter into a self-imposed hallucination that everything is fine. Just like the pigeon closing its eyes when it is being attacked by a cat. 

Choiceless awareness requires a very different understanding of life. When we see pain and pleasure in a very different way. One can observe each and every scene, setting, and act on the movie screen when one is not overwhelmed by the hero. Choices are made by a conditioned mind. However, it is almost impossible for a conditioned mind to observe its conditioning. That's why most of us are in a hurry to conclude, depending upon our conditioning. There are hardly one or two in the movie hall who can observe each and every scene being played on the screen, noticing the minutest details. The rest are just desperate to see the climax. Most people have concluded that X or Y will give them happiness and are desperate to reach there. They fail to realize that the more they are desperate, the tighter they hold life in their hands, and the quicker it slips out of their hands. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
श्रीमान आपके विचार अति उत्तम हैं। परंतु जिन पौराणिक कथाओं की प्रामाणिकता संभव नहीं है, उनके उदाहरण देना कितना उचित है क्योंकि जब वर्तमान पल एवं क्षणों पर ही ध्यान केंद्रित करना है तब अप्रामाणिक संदर्भों को रखने से स्वयं के अनुभव एवं मौलिकता का अभाव परिलक्षित होता है। गुड़ के भले ही कोई कितने भी गुणों का बखान कर ले, परंतु स्वाद के बारे में खाने पर ही बताया जा सकता है। यह मेरा निजी विचार है।

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...

Why life is so stressful?

The present-day society is the most comfortable in the entire history of humanity. We have invented machines to carry out work at home, have built highways, can fly conveniently across countries, have comfortable homes, have information of almost every kind at our fingertips, and also have AI to help us make use of the information. Advances in robotics have made many apparently impossible tasks quite easy to perform. Yet, so many countries are at war, people are suffering from psychological disorders, depression, there are broken relationships everywhere, and people are under tremendous stress. What has gone wrong in the process? Why is development not bringing happiness? Because we have chosen "comforts" over "growth". Because we have chosen "fear" over "love". Doesn't that sound strange? Why would somebody choose "fear" over "love"? Probably, we are not aware of it while making these choices. Our unconscious mind process...