Skip to main content

I know, you don't know

Relationships may be magical, as well as the greatest cause of our sufferings. There are various types of relationships, including the parent-child relationship, the husband-wife relationship, the relationship between friends, the relationship between colleagues, and the boss-subordinate relationship. We all have relationships. What is the reason that some of these relationships are so enjoyable, while others are a great cause of suffering? All those relationships that are shadowed by complexes become painful. Superiority and inferiority complexes make relationships painful. 

There may be broadly four types of relationships. First, "I know, you don't know". In these relationships, we presume that we know and the other person does not know. Since we have a better exposure to life, we compare ourselves with the other person and start making the other person feel that he does not know. We keep pointing out the mistakes in the other person. This type is quite common in parent-child and boss-subordinate relationships. Naturally, parents and bosses have greater exposure to life and therefore, they would have many experiences that children or subordinates do not have. There is no problem, as long as the parents want to guide the children with their experience. The problem is with the "closed mind." When we close our minds, we become arrogant and bossy. We want to prove that we know more than you. The relationship becomes a battlefield to dominate and prove our superiority rather than a breeding ground for love and compassion. We develop a "one size fits all" solution and impose that on our kids. 

Second, "I don't know, you know". In these relationships, we presume that we don't know, and the other person knows. We stop applying our minds to the problem at hand and expect the other person to provide all the solutions to us. We become overdependent. Slowly and gradually, the other person gets overburdened and often gets irritated. These dependencies make the other person quite insecure because he has to think of the "dependent partner" all the time and is unable to explore the growth opportunities. That brings both of them to a lower level of exploration, and both suffer in the process and live a substandard life.

Third, "I know, you know". These relationships are happy relationships, where both partners have confidence in the capacity of each other. At the same time, since they both have a belief that they know, there is not much of growth. They are both equally closed to whatever meaning of life they have understood and remain confined to that. In the eyes of the world, these relationships are perfect, but there is not much opportunity to grow. 

The most wonderful relationships are "I don't know, you don't know". When both partners have this feeling, then both explore and help each other explore. The moment we have a feeling that we don't know and I want to know, the entire universe is a classroom, and we learn from any and everything. That makes us grow each moment of life. Every conversation with the partner is an opportunity to grow and learn. We enjoy discussions for hours on each aspect of life. In the process, we both get to know and grow.

Ideally, all our relationships should fall in the fourth category. It is quite natural to believe that in a world where there are billions of galaxies, with each galaxy having billions of stars, we naturally don't know so many things. Where does that feeling of "I know" or "You know" come from? When we do not work hard to understand life, we tend to acquire some meaning of life, as told by our parents or society, or as we read in a book or hear from some Guru. Since we never examined its reality, we are not confident of the same at the core of our hearts. However, at the same time, we have structured our entire life around that and all our decisions are based on that meaning we have made. That's why we somehow want to prove that we are right. That's why we become so aggressive. Some of us are still confused about the meaning of life, and these people get easily targeted by the "big mouth," and they become fans of the people who can boast of knowing the meaning of life. "I don't know" attitude requires constant enquiry and awareness. Most people somehow want to be certain and therefore develop all these complexes and make their lives limited.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It is very true. Nobody can know nature even remotely hence we should have approach I don't know. It will give us the opportunity to learn and grow in all respects.
Ajay Singla said…
I am OK, You are OK... backbone of transactional analysis. Good parallel...Well written
vipul said…
The domain of “I don’t know, I don’t know is the most wonderful domain. It makes our lives fulfilling. Else everything is just routine and repetition

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...

Why life is so stressful?

The present-day society is the most comfortable in the entire history of humanity. We have invented machines to carry out work at home, have built highways, can fly conveniently across countries, have comfortable homes, have information of almost every kind at our fingertips, and also have AI to help us make use of the information. Advances in robotics have made many apparently impossible tasks quite easy to perform. Yet, so many countries are at war, people are suffering from psychological disorders, depression, there are broken relationships everywhere, and people are under tremendous stress. What has gone wrong in the process? Why is development not bringing happiness? Because we have chosen "comforts" over "growth". Because we have chosen "fear" over "love". Doesn't that sound strange? Why would somebody choose "fear" over "love"? Probably, we are not aware of it while making these choices. Our unconscious mind process...