Skip to main content

Is society a reflection of what we are?

I was discussing with a colleague today about driving in the USA. Here, we are often apprehensive even if our light is green and naturally press the brake, fearing that somebody would try to jump the red light and our car will bump into their vehicle. We often see pedestrians and two-wheelers jumping the red lights. Many people try to drive their vehicles on the wrong side, which creates immense possibilities of accidents. On the other hand, in the USA, if a person tries to press the brake while the light is green, it is considered a big irritant by the people who are behind that vehicle. Thus, there is a trust issue due to the habit pattern of people developed over a period of time. 

The trust issue is not confined to driving; rather, it spreads across almost all the domains of our lives. We go to buy a product in the market and end up buying a spurious product. Next time, we will become quite cautious while buying the products from the market. We need to be cautious even while buying the vegetables and fruits, and need to check that nothing has been injected into them. Even milk at many places is made of chemicals. People do not mind taking the lives of others for petty benefits. Yet, everybody pretends to be religious. Ideally, the markets should have provided opportunities for everybody to come out with the best products and ensure fair competition. Unfortunately, they have become places where people doubt every advertisement, and people feel cheated, and the cheaters flourish.

The same culture is quite prevalent in many organizations. Most people put their self-interest above the interest of the organization. The resources of the organizations are misused for personal benefits of the people working in the organizations. There is a race to hijack the credit. The poor employee at the bottom works hard, and the people sitting at the top not only take away their credit but also try to frighten them. People play games. People "smartly" manage to work minimum and project maximum. There is hardly any premium for intelligence and hard work. The hardest-working employees of the organizations get disillusioned and move away. Ideally, the organizations that should have provided opportunities for the individuals to excel and explore their potential have become the case studies for killing potential and aspirations, and it is unfortunate to see the best of the manpower getting spoiled in these organizations. 

The same problem is in relationships. Relationships have become inauthentic. We form relationships and make efforts therein so that we can help each other grow. We can help each other at the time of crisis, so we need not be worried about the crisis, and we can concentrate on growth. But, actually, relationships have become one of the greatest barriers to growth. Unless both persons want to grow in the same direction, each one has to give space to the other. Relationships are not bondages. Relationships are not for slavery. Unfortunately, relationships are not like contracts, where everything is written in black and white at the beginning of the relationship. Relationships develop as we grow. Nobody would be the same person as he was a decade back. We grow with our experiences. Definitely, two people may grow differently, and that's why there is a need for some space. An immature society treats relationships as bondage, and that's why people keep suffering in relationships despite not having any worthwhile interaction. People pretend and become inauthentic due to their inability to withstand the pressure of social criticism. That's why they find it so difficult to say "no". That's why they attend the social functions, praise the host, and, while coming back, criticise the host. That's why people praise their relatives on their face, and criticise them on their back. 

The authenticity of any society is key to its progress. We may discuss all the ideals in the world, but what truly matters is our actual behavior. When we fail to practice what we preach, society is doomed. We can't preach fearlessness to our children while brimming with fear. We can't advocate love and compassion while we are consumed by greed. Kids will learn from what they observe. If we prioritize self-interest over the well-being of the organization, children will naturally adopt selfishness. If we criticize our relatives behind their backs while praising them to their faces, children will struggle to appreciate the integrity of character. A flawed society reflects poor parenting, which is why our hope lies in proper parenting. We must all examine ourselves to recognize our inauthenticities and weaknesses in integrity. Once we acknowledge these, we have the chance to correct ourselves, and that learning will inevitably transfer to our children. If we make everything around us, including relationships, a means to our selfish ends, children will learn the same behavior, and we will have no right to complain about society. Parents must demonstrate the true meaning of relationships through their actions if they want their children to cultivate loving relationships. If parents lack love and compassion in their lives and do not value freedom, truth, and exploration, how can we expect children to develop such aspirations? They are more likely to become entrapped by a society that fosters low aspirations characterized by greed and hatred. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Choice of Happiness

I often wonder as to what is the meaning of equality? Some are born into families that can spend thousands of crore rupees to make their kids happy, and many can not buy enough food for their kids and their kids sleep hungry stomach and still remain happy and grateful. Some travel by private jet while many have to travel in the locals like cattle. Some own many buildings worth thousands of crores while many sleep on the streets. If somebody knows how to manipulate the systems, the sky is the limit in this world. However, all these hold true, if we believe that happiness is a by-product of money. In fact, I see that the reality is quite the contrary. First of all, life is much more than money. There are 12 houses in Astrology representing 12 different dimensions of life. The first house represents health, the second wealth, the third initiatives and younger siblings, the fourth vehicles, properties, and everything that comes as a result of our initiatives, the fifth new direction, and k...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...