Skip to main content

Did Buddha and Einstein make sacrifices?

We all contribute in different spheres of life and in diverse roles assigned to us. We contribute as mothers, fathers, daughters, sons, employees, employers, and friends. In some cases, such contribution requires great sacrifice. Somebody sacrifices his life while fighting for the country, somebody donates his kidney to another person, somebody donates all his money for a social cause. But a question arises whether there exists a possibility of contribution or sacrifice without love?

Somebody long back sent a video to me and I found the old man speaking in the video to be the wisest man. He said that love is dynamic. When we interact and talk to each other, listen to each other, we undergo a change. A part of "I" becomes part of "you" and a part of "you" becomes part of "I". After each interaction, "I" and "you" have undergone a change. So much so that when we connect with each other without filters and guards, osmosis and reverse osmosis take place and at some time, there remains little difference between "I" and "you" and in fact there comes time when "I" and "you" tend to react almost same way to different situations. 

This process called "love" is quite rare in this world because we are full of insecurities. Out of these insecurities, we are always guarded. We always have firewalls. We do not allow anybody to enter the deepest place of our being. We do not share our darkest of secrets with anybody. We are afraid of being blackmailed or being misunderstood. We feel vulnerable that the other person will "judge" us. We have so much fixation on our "I" and that's why we try to maintain the best projection of this "I", however fake that projection may be. In fact, out of the fears and insecurities, slowly and gradually, we lose awareness of what we are and believe what our "self image" is. It becomes quite difficult and uncomfortable for us to accept what we really are and our entire self becomes inauthentic. An inauthentic self can never love. How can there be a connection between two persons when the real self is imprisoned in the dark cell by the "self image". When two inauthentic "self images" exchange ideas and thoughts, that's not going to lead us anywhere near reality. Love is real and not a story. 

This process of osmosis and reverse osmosis can take place between persons and also between a person and some concept. Somebody loves his kids and family, and somebody may love the concept of a nation or an organisation or harmony. When somebody loves his kids, he takes care of his kids and at times sacrifices his personal comforts. However, if there is love, there is no feeling of sacrifice or contribution because when "I" love "somebody", that "somebody" is part of "me" and that's why whatever I am doing is doing for myself and there is no question of contribution or sacrifice. We feel like sacrificing and contributing only when we do not love. That's a very different phenomenon. Probably we are suffering from the "low self worth" and we want to enhance the same by sacrificing a part of our comforts and possessions (mostly unused) so that the society recognises the "good work" we have done in exchange. That's behind donations by rich people in most cases. 

"Contribution" and "sacrifice" without love is just a manipulation to raise the "self image". Often such "contributions" and "sacrifices" are full of "violence" and "expectations". That's why Krishna gave the concept of "swadharma". I need to act according to my nature or "dharma". All of us have different temperaments and different skill sets. If we do what we "love", it does not require sacrifice to contribute. Contribution takes place naturally. We feel contented because we did what we loved to do, and because we do what we love, we are in a state of "flow" and our efficiency is at its peak. We forget the sense of time, and since there is no sense of time, there is no feeling of effort. In that state, we end up contributing greatly without even feeling that we have made efforts. Buddha would not feel like making efforts when he is talking to people. It's natural to him. Einstein would not feel like making efforts, rather he is doing what he loves. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Choice of Happiness

I often wonder as to what is the meaning of equality? Some are born into families that can spend thousands of crore rupees to make their kids happy, and many can not buy enough food for their kids and their kids sleep hungry stomach and still remain happy and grateful. Some travel by private jet while many have to travel in the locals like cattle. Some own many buildings worth thousands of crores while many sleep on the streets. If somebody knows how to manipulate the systems, the sky is the limit in this world. However, all these hold true, if we believe that happiness is a by-product of money. In fact, I see that the reality is quite the contrary. First of all, life is much more than money. There are 12 houses in Astrology representing 12 different dimensions of life. The first house represents health, the second wealth, the third initiatives and younger siblings, the fourth vehicles, properties, and everything that comes as a result of our initiatives, the fifth new direction, and k...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...