Skip to main content

Complete Surrender

 There is often a discussion on complete surrender on the path of spirituality. A question arises surrender by whom to whom. If surrender is by the mind to the divine, that can never happen because the mind will always be separate from the divine. Ramakrishna Paramhansa explained this by giving the example of a salt lump that is thrown into the sea. It will remain separate from the sea and then start melting into the sea. Until it completely melts, it is different from the sea and the moment it melts completely, there is no salt only sea. Thus, there appears an impossibility of complete surrender by the mind. 

If "I" is also a part of the divine, there is no need for surrender. Ramakrishna told another story of Hanuman. Rama asked Hanuman to explain his bhakti. Hanumana said that when I am at my lowest level of awareness, I see myself as your servant. When my level of awareness is better I see myself as your part. When I am at the highest level of awareness, I see no difference between myself and you. So, at the highest level of awareness, the mind is no different from the divine and therefore there is no question of surrender. Why will light surrender to light? There is no difference between the two and there can at best be a merger of the two. In fact, even a merger is not required because the two are the same and separated just to do two different tasks just like the same electricity passing through different wires to play the TV and washing machine together. Electricity is the electricity. The problem arises when of electricity says that I am washing machine and then the washing machine wants to surrender to electricity which is an impossibility.

Thus, where is the question of surrender? "ego" can never surrender to the divine and there is no question of surrender by the "divine" to the "divine". That is why I sometimes wonder whether this entire concept of surrender is the creation of the cult of gurus who sell the product of enlightenment in the name of surrender and the "surrendered" mind stops questioning their ways and means. Did Rama, Krishna, Buddha, or Mahavira surrender? Did Kabira surrender? They questioned any and everything. They discriminated between the truth and false. Their intellect was so strong that they could place the things in the right place. Why would we evolve into intellectual beings if intellect has no role in the process of evolution? 

I sometimes feel that surrender is probably some ego defense mechanism whereby the people advocating surrender try to attribute their actions to destiny. I am not happy with some of my actions in the past and I bring the theory of surrender so as to get over the guilt. Probably that's like running away from reality. Probably if we accept that those actions were the result of ignorance of the intellect and the spiritual journey is all about awareness, to an extent, that the intellect is completely aware of every moment, it can see through things, and its understanding is not restricted by any facade, probably then we do not need to surrender. There is a complete merger. The merger of the intellect into the consciousness. One can see the movement of the ego. One can see which decisions are being driven by the ignorance-induced ego and which decisions are being taken with awareness. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why life is so stressful?

The present-day society is the most comfortable in the entire history of humanity. We have invented machines to carry out work at home, have built highways, can fly conveniently across countries, have comfortable homes, have information of almost every kind at our fingertips, and also have AI to help us make use of the information. Advances in robotics have made many apparently impossible tasks quite easy to perform. Yet, so many countries are at war, people are suffering from psychological disorders, depression, there are broken relationships everywhere, and people are under tremendous stress. What has gone wrong in the process? Why is development not bringing happiness? Because we have chosen "comforts" over "growth". Because we have chosen "fear" over "love". Doesn't that sound strange? Why would somebody choose "fear" over "love"? Probably, we are not aware of it while making these choices. Our unconscious mind process...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adding a Third Dimension to Life

 We face various conflicts in our lives. Whether to play with friends or concentrate on studies is one of the most common conflicts of the students which has now been replaced with a conflict between the concentration on studies and spending time on social media and mobile. Adults often have trouble establishing a work-life balance. These conflicts are the reflection of the ongoing struggle between comforts and ambitions. We get some comfort due to the stars in our horoscope, we are born with, or our past efforts. Some choose to enjoy these comforts and pleasures while some delay gratification, constantly move along the X-axis, and have a very linear view of life. Others choose to work hard for their ambitions and give away the pleasures and comforts, move along the Y-axis, and have a "two-dimensional view of life". They grow in worldly terms and that is the reason why they occupy the best of positions, become industrialists and intellectuals, and develop the capacity to look...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Comfortable Life full of Fears

 Why did Buddha reject the offer of a comfortable life as a prince from his father? Why do most people grab such an opportunity? Why do most people struggle all through their lives to get such a comfortable life? It is because most people can't see what Buddha could see. That is exactly why Buddha wanted to tell the secret to the entire world.  Buddha asked questions to his charioteer about disease and death. He could have closed his eyes to the suffering of the people and sat happily inside his palace. But he enquired into the nature of death and diseases, the old age and pains thereof. He asked whether anyone can avoid suffering, and came to know that it is not possible to avoid the sufferings of old age, diseases, and death. He was determined to find a solution and therefore delved deeper and deeper into the nature of suffering and its source. His inner journey revealed the secrets that he shared with the whole world. The real cause of suffering is ignorance.  We form ...
Post a Comment
Read more