Skip to main content

Compassion while handling a mad elephant

 As we move along the path of spirituality, we connect to our soul. However, the people we are related to in this worldly life may still be living life anchored in the external world. That brings two types of reactions from such relatives. Either they start ignoring the ones moving along the spiritual path, considering them to be useless because such people do not subscribe to their philosophy of life, and in fact, at times challenge them and such a challenge creates discomfort and unease. In order to avoid that discomfort, a better option is to avoid such people. Such a response generally does not create problems for both. The ones moving along the spiritual path are happy internally and the ones anchored in the external world make efforts to fulfill their greed and ambitions.

However, the world is not that simple. Had the world been that simple, Rama would have finished his exile peacefully and gone back to Ayodhya with Lakshmana and Sita without any battle with Ravana. The problem is greedy Ravana does not leave Sita living her life quietly in a forest. Greedy Duryodhana is not ready to give just 5 villages to Pandavas so that Pandavas can also survive peacefully. Prejudiced Bali is not ready to accept the genuine conclusion drawn by his brother that because he did not come out for such a long time, he would have died and the prejudiced mind sees conspiracy in everything. 

The problem is that the person anchored in the external world is so fixated on his greed or ambition that he just becomes blind. His perspective becomes so narrow that he is not able to see the reality. Rama who himself is the lord prayed by Ravana becomes an enemy. That is what external anchoring does to us. Since we get disconnected from the true self, we become restless to regain our inner state of contentment. We try hard through external means and the more we try, the more incomplete we feel. We become desperate and like a mad elephant, we become destructive. We may have compassion with the mad elephant, but we know at the same time that the mad elephant may kill many innocents out of his anger.

This madness generally takes two different forms. If the person anchored in the external world is weak, this madness gets reflected in the cycle of unreasonable demands, crying, fears, anxieties, and at times depression. If he is strong, such madness is reflected in the form of fits of anger, aggression, debates, violent arguments, verbal abuse, and at times physical aggression. 

I feel that it is a real test of Sadhana to handle such madness with compassion. I do feel that compassion is an inner state and has nothing to do with the actions. Rama killed Ravana because killing Ravana was necessary for the people living in Lanka and for the entire world. Ravana, due to his greed and ambitions, was making their lives quite difficult. However, even while killing Ravana, that compassion was always there in Rama. That is why, when Ravana was taking the last few breaths, after being hit in the naval, Rama asked Lakshmana to go and take life lessons from him. That is compassion. We may have compassion with the mad elephant as well. However, that does not mean that we will not take care of madness. We may use force to control the mad elephant and the elephant is definitely not going to like that. In extreme cases, situations may demand even the killing of the mad elephant as happened in the case of Ravana, yet the only measure of spiritual growth remains whether there is compassion at the core of such actions or not.

Compassion is not limited rather it is universal. When Rama has compassion with Ravana, he has compassion with the entire universe. He sees the suffering of the people with the deeds of Ravana and understands that unless Ravana changes, he needs to be killed. Out of compassion, he gives multiple opportunities to Ravana to change. He is not afraid of Ravana, else the easiest course of action would have been Hanumana bringing Sita with him. Since Rama has compassion for the universe, he can not leave the people of Lanka suffering like that. Even after finding the whereabouts of Sita, for Rama, revenge is not the primary aim. Had that been the case, he would not have given Ravana an opportunity to send Sita back. Out of compassion, he takes action to attack Lanka.

Compassion disappears when we take sides. When we divide the world into right and wrong. Rama is good and Ravana is wrong. The other person is wrong and we are right. We lose awareness of the core. We get blinded to the fact that all beings share the same consciousness and it is just that somebody has got fixated on something and if that fixation is prohibiting the growth of others, that fixation has to disappear. We need to just try to make the other person realize the consequences of such fixations. However, in the process, if we hold him wrong, we automatically start making ourselves right and our equanimity is gone. We wear the glasses of being right in our eyes and start judging others. Awareness of the real self makes us fearless in handling such situations. We act with compassion rather than with fear or aggression. Equanimity brings intelligence to our responses because the actions are no longer reactions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Choice of Happiness

I often wonder as to what is the meaning of equality? Some are born into families that can spend thousands of crore rupees to make their kids happy, and many can not buy enough food for their kids and their kids sleep hungry stomach and still remain happy and grateful. Some travel by private jet while many have to travel in the locals like cattle. Some own many buildings worth thousands of crores while many sleep on the streets. If somebody knows how to manipulate the systems, the sky is the limit in this world. However, all these hold true, if we believe that happiness is a by-product of money. In fact, I see that the reality is quite the contrary. First of all, life is much more than money. There are 12 houses in Astrology representing 12 different dimensions of life. The first house represents health, the second wealth, the third initiatives and younger siblings, the fourth vehicles, properties, and everything that comes as a result of our initiatives, the fifth new direction, and k...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...