Skip to main content

Born Aware to Die Dumb?

One of the most amazing attributes of a "stupid" person is his conviction. He has so little exposure to life that he is quite convinced of what he thinks. The top-notch scientists of the day are not sure of the universe's genesis, but a "stupid" person would be convinced of the universe's genesis based on whatever he has heard in the mythological stories prevalent in his society. This "conviction" is very attractive. People want certainty, and that is why these "idiots" are sold heavily in the market. 

It makes sense. Why would somebody like to go for inconclusive and confused advice? But at what cost? You go to a baba and the baba tells with certainty that you imagine "God" using a particular technique, and due to constant "mental visualization" of God, you get to hallucinate meeting God. Yes, it has fulfilled the long-pending desire. But what has it done to our lives? Hasn't it wrapped our lives with a thick layer of lies? Lies that we believe to be true. How does that false satisfaction of "meeting God" help us? We would be selling that idea to a thousand more people we interact with, and if the majority of our own circle "meets God" the same way, we all will be scratching each other's backs. But what purpose does it serve? It's like staying in a village full of idiots where idiocy is idealised. 

We are born "aware" but die "dumb". A Child is open to observing everything without biases. However, by the time we are about to die, we have "bulletproof belief systems". No bullet of "observation" can enter our bulletproof minds. We see our old parents struggling with psychological issues primarily due to their "bulletproof minds," and yet would never contemplate the same and continue to remain limited and closed. We would see wars all around due to these bulletproof minds, and yet would continue to believe that nothing would happen to us. 

Yesterday, I was reading a book titled "Habit" by Charles Duhigg, and while reading the introduction, something struck my mind. The author has mentioned that while we encounter something, our mind is quite observant initially, and then the moment it finds some "familiar habit pattern", observation drops, and we act habitually thereafter. That's the brain's formula to save energy. That's what we do in most of the discussions. We start with the observation of the points being made by the other person, and soon our brains stop listening to what the other person is saying and start thinking about our past beliefs and thoughts on the subject. There is very little listening. The more we are convinced of our framework of life, the less we listen. This conviction about our thoughts and beliefs is again due to a lack of listening. Thus, this is a chicken-and-egg problem. 

We are definitely not born aware to die dumb. However, "bulletproof minds" do not allow observation so easily. We all carry "bulletproof minds" without even realizing it. We all have the choice to die dumb or stay aware. If someone acknowledges the "stupidity" of dying dumb, they will seek a solution. The simplest solution is to read books by various authors on different subjects, watch movies set in diverse contexts, meet people from different cultures, interact with them, and travel to various parts of the world. "Meditation" is, of course, a very strong solution provided we understand what meditation is. It is not to sit cross-legged and keep watching our thoughts like a movie. It is "choiceless observation" of each and every thought and sensation. All these activities expand our minds to new inputs for which we have not yet formed beliefs, allowing us to examine things afresh. They strengthen our "muscles of observation." The next time we revisit our beliefs, a "little window" in the "bulletproof mind" opens to observe and assimilate a different perspective. Undoubtedly, this will make us feel "uncertain" because the "conviction and certainty of belief" will be shaken by new exposure. While it may make us uncomfortable, it is up to us to choose between the "comfort of idiocy" and the "uncertainty of reality." 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Choice of Happiness

I often wonder as to what is the meaning of equality? Some are born into families that can spend thousands of crore rupees to make their kids happy, and many can not buy enough food for their kids and their kids sleep hungry stomach and still remain happy and grateful. Some travel by private jet while many have to travel in the locals like cattle. Some own many buildings worth thousands of crores while many sleep on the streets. If somebody knows how to manipulate the systems, the sky is the limit in this world. However, all these hold true, if we believe that happiness is a by-product of money. In fact, I see that the reality is quite the contrary. First of all, life is much more than money. There are 12 houses in Astrology representing 12 different dimensions of life. The first house represents health, the second wealth, the third initiatives and younger siblings, the fourth vehicles, properties, and everything that comes as a result of our initiatives, the fifth new direction, and k...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...