Skip to main content

"Ego" of "Sattva"

There are three Gunas of nature. Tamas, Rajas and Sattva. Tamas implies fixation to a form. Rajas implies energetic movement and Satva implies expansion. For example, water exists in all three forms. Water, when frozen, is Tamas; when moving like a river, it is Rajas, and when it takes the form of clouds, it is Sattva. The right balance of all the Gunas is necessary for the survival and growth of nature. 

In Indian scriptures Tamas has been linked to Danavas and Sattva has been associated with Devas. Devas and Danavas are always at the fight. Sometimes Danavas rule the world and sometimes devas rule the world. When Danavas ruled the world, it became very prosperous within their kingdom, but at the same time, they stopped the expansion and growth of the world. When Danavas rules the world, the world expands. Lord Shiva is prayed by both the Devas and Danavas and he equally blesses both. Shiva is not biased towards one Guna or the other. He blesses everybody equally, whoever wants to explore different possibilities. 

I feel that many people who associate themselves with Sattva Guna become excessively obsessed with the same and fail to understand that every Guna has its role to play in nature. That is the reason they develop an "ego" with the Sattva guna. "I" am working for the welfare of the society, for the upliftment of the poor and downtrodden, for a cause and all different types of identification take place with the activities driven by Sattva. There is no doubt that the people with "Tamas" and "Rajas" are equally fixated. In fact, there are more people fixated with "Tamas" and "Rajas" and that is why we see so many people in this world who can do anything to earn more money and get powerful positions. We see people around us driven by their ambitions, willing to work day and night to fulfil their ambitions. However, the difference being that the "so called wise people" of the society acknowledge the "ego" of Tamasik and Rajasik people but ignore the "ego" of the Sattvik people. That is why it becomes increasingly difficult for the Sattvik to correct their course.

The spiritual pursuit should not be confused with the Gunas. Shiva is the sole guide of the spiritual process, unbound by any frame. He blesses both the Devas and Danavas equally. In the realm of spirit, there can be no fixation on form. At the quantum level, within the Higgs field, all matter takes form and then merges back into the field, which remains unaffected. Whenever a realized soul acts in this world, it functions within the domain of Sattva, striving for the growth of all human beings while recognizing that Tamas, Rajas, and Sattva are all part of the same reality and therefore essential. This realization is challenging, as many of our fixations are deeply rooted in the unconscious, and unless we confront these deep impressions, they will dominate our existence. It takes absolute awareness for Krishna to be a charioteer rather than a warrior on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, fully aware that He could win the battle instantly. He understands that while the Pandavas must win for the balance of the three Gunas to be restored, what matters more is that they gain the wisdom to handle their victory. Without that wisdom, they too will likely fall into the trap of fixations. That is why Krishna is guiding the Pandavas at every step making them aware of their own fixations to the social narratives, conventions, and rules and to act in a state of complete awareness. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weak Minds

 I don't know what Rama would have felt like when he developed Vairagya looking around at the temporariness of life, and all the material objects. He had the blessed company of saints like Vashistha and Vishvamitra who could answer hundreds of his questions with example and their experiences. King Dashratha was spiritually mature and therefore rather than snubbing the Vairagya of Rama, he could request Vashistha and Vishvamitra to answer the questions asked by Rama. When Siddhartha had similar questions in his mind, he had nobody to answer and his father, in fact, tried to keep him away from the questions about life. That is the strategy of probably the entire society today. If you can not answer the question, prove the question itself to be wrong.  That is what happens to anybody having these questions about the purpose of life. The first response he gets from society is that all these questions are a waste of time. In the entire history of humanity, we have not been able to ...

Choice of Happiness

I often wonder as to what is the meaning of equality? Some are born into families that can spend thousands of crore rupees to make their kids happy, and many can not buy enough food for their kids and their kids sleep hungry stomach and still remain happy and grateful. Some travel by private jet while many have to travel in the locals like cattle. Some own many buildings worth thousands of crores while many sleep on the streets. If somebody knows how to manipulate the systems, the sky is the limit in this world. However, all these hold true, if we believe that happiness is a by-product of money. In fact, I see that the reality is quite the contrary. First of all, life is much more than money. There are 12 houses in Astrology representing 12 different dimensions of life. The first house represents health, the second wealth, the third initiatives and younger siblings, the fourth vehicles, properties, and everything that comes as a result of our initiatives, the fifth new direction, and k...

Use of AI to understand the purpose of Life

I was listening to an interesting debate on the following YouTube link that ignited a series of thoughts in my mind: https://youtu.be/o2aAx3wk6dg?si=qLSwKnR0Cp4TyLPC It is interesting to imagine a world where we can get almost everything done with just a command right from driving a car to flying a plane, doing the homework to making presentations for the meeting, taking care of the plants to taking care of the parents, getting the food cooked to get the surgeries done.  After listening to the discussions, I was quite amazed at the idea of delegating the decision-making to the AI and investing our time in exploration. Decisions about whatever is in the domain of known may be taken by the AI in the future and human beings may be busy exploring new possibilities.  However, how will AI make the decisions? Suppose, during the Ramayana times, AI was fully developed. How Kaikeyi would have taken the decision? I believe for AI or anybody to make a decision, the desired goal has to be...